Miericke v. Lemoine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Miericke v. Lemoine

786 S.W.2d 810, 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 879, 1990 WL 50750

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 30, 1990

DocketNo. 05-89-01453-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 786 S.W.2d 810 (Miericke v. Lemoine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miericke v. Lemoine, 786 S.W.2d 810, 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 879, 1990 WL 50750 (Tex. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Susan Sebastian Lemoine Miericke, is attempting to appeal an award of attorney’s fees and costs from a habeas corpus proceeding. Because this Court has no jurisdiction to review the granting of a writ of habeas corpus, Gray v. Rankin, 594 S.W.2d 409, 409 (Tex.1980) (per curiam), we requested briefs on the issue of whether this Court has jurisdiction to review an award of attorney’s fees and costs emanating from a habeas corpus proceeding. We hold that this Court has jurisdiction to review the award of attorney’s fees and costs.

Lemoine brought a writ of habeas corpus proceeding against Miericke in order to gain possession of T.A. Lemoine, a minor child. The trial court granted Lemoine’s writ of habeas corpus, ordered Miericke to deliver possession of the minor child to Lemoine, and ordered Miericke to pay $2,000 in attorney’s fees and $230 in costs. In her jurisdictional brief, Miericke states that she is appealing only the award of attorney’s fees and costs, not the granting of the writ of habeas corpus.

Section 11.18(a) of the Texas Family Code authorizes the award of attorney’s fees and costs in a habeas corpus proceeding. The award of attorney’s fees and costs is generally appealable. See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 11.19(a) (Vernon 1986).

The granting or denying of a writ of habeas corpus is not appealable. Gray, 594 S.W.2d at 409. Where a judgment or order contains both appealable and nonap-pealable portions, this Court has jurisdiction over the appealable portion. See Dallas Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Mouer, 533 S.W.2d 70, 73 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1976, no writ); Brown v. Gulf Coast Machine & Supply Co., 551 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Jernigan v. Jernigan, 467 S.W.2d 621, 625 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1971, writ dism’d w.o.j.). Accordingly, we hold that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal of an award of attorney’s fees and costs emanating from a habeas corpus proceeding.

The time for filing briefs on the merits will begin from the date of this opinion.

BAKER, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Susan Sebastian Lemoine Miericke, is attempting to appeal an award of attorney’s fees and costs from a habeas corpus proceeding. Because this Court has no jurisdiction to review the granting of a writ of habeas corpus, Gray v. Rankin, 594 S.W.2d 409, 409 (Tex.1980) (per curiam), we requested briefs on the issue of whether this Court has jurisdiction to review an award of attorney’s fees and costs emanating from a habeas corpus proceeding. We hold that this Court has jurisdiction to review the award of attorney’s fees and costs.

Lemoine brought a writ of habeas corpus proceeding against Miericke in order to gain possession of T.A. Lemoine, a minor child. The trial court granted Lemoine’s writ of habeas corpus, ordered Miericke to deliver possession of the minor child to Lemoine, and ordered Miericke to pay $2,000 in attorney’s fees and $230 in costs. In her jurisdictional brief, Miericke states that she is appealing only the award of attorney’s fees and costs, not the granting of the writ of habeas corpus.

Section 11.18(a) of the Texas Family Code authorizes the award of attorney’s fees and costs in a habeas corpus proceeding. The award of attorney’s fees and costs is generally appealable. See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 11.19(a) (Vernon 1986).

The granting or denying of a writ of habeas corpus is not appealable. Gray, 594 S.W.2d at 409. Where a judgment or order contains both appealable and nonap-pealable portions, this Court has jurisdiction over the appealable portion. See Dallas Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Mouer, 533 S.W.2d 70, 73 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1976, no writ); Brown v. Gulf Coast Machine & Supply Co., 551 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Jernigan v. Jernigan, 467 S.W.2d 621, 625 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1971, writ dism’d w.o.j.). Accordingly, we hold that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal of an award of attorney’s fees and costs emanating from a habeas corpus proceeding.

The time for filing briefs on the merits will begin from the date of this opinion.

BAKER, J., dissenting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

786 S.W.2d 810, 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 879, 1990 WL 50750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miericke-v-lemoine-texapp-1990.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack