Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
This text of 923 P.2d 836 (Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court granted review of the Petition for Review filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Cindy Hoekstra on March 19, 1996, ordering that the parties file supplemental briefs and the case be set for oral argument once briefing was complete.
The parties notified the Court in late August that they had arrived at a settlement and suggested that the Court’s grant of review be dismissed. Shortly thereafter, the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association filed a motion asking this Court to resolve the issues raised by the case in spite of the parties’ settlement or, in the alternative, to depublish the Court of Appeals’ opinion.
After consideration of all issues raised in this case and the various motions and responses filed herein,
IT IS ORDERED that the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association’s request to appear as amicus curia is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association’s Request to Resolve Case Despite Settlement is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association’s Motion to Depublish the Opinion of the Court of Appeals is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the case is moot, the order granting review is vacated and the Petition for Review is dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall have this order published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
923 P.2d 836, 186 Ariz. 370, 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miel-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ariz-1996.