Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.
278 A.D. 682, 103 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1951·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
As the discontinuance annuls all that has taken place in the action, there is no occasion for the concern which appellant expresses as to its rights of appeal from the order of summary judgment. Neither in this respect nor in any other respect will . appellant be prejudiced by the discontinuance. Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp., 278 A.D. 682, 103 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
278 A.D. 682 (Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newman v. Newman
245 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & McTootle
37 Misc. 2d 988 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. (Of Delaware)
206 F.2d 103 (Second Circuit, 1953)
Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Mfg. Co. of Delaware
108 F. Supp. 170 (S.D. New York, 1952)