Midwest Special Surgery, P.C. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.

514 S.W.3d 60, 2017 WL 1056204, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 200
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 21, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104706
StatusPublished

This text of 514 S.W.3d 60 (Midwest Special Surgery, P.C. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midwest Special Surgery, P.C. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co., 514 S.W.3d 60, 2017 WL 1056204, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Midwest Special Surgery (Appellant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying Appellant’s Application for Payment of Additional Reimbursement of Medical Fees as untimely filed. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222 (Mo.banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection
121 S.W.3d 220 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 S.W.3d 60, 2017 WL 1056204, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midwest-special-surgery-pc-v-houghton-mifflin-harcourt-publishing-co-moctapp-2017.