Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama)

707 F. App'x 952
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 3, 2018·No. 16-16849·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Midwest Feeders appeals the District Court’s grant of a motion to dismiss its complaint for failure to state a claim. After review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the complaint was properly dismissed because the facts of this case do not give rise to any claim asserted by Midwest Feeders.

For example, it is obvious that Midwest Feeders is not within the class of “ ‘[p]er-son[s] entitled to enforce’ an instrument” within the meaning of O.C.G.A § 11-3-301. Furthermore, its common law conversion claim is clearly preempted by O.C.G.A. § 11-3-420. See Ownbey Enters., Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 457 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1353-54 (N.D. Ga. 2006) (citing Jacobs v. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 125 Ga. App. 462, 188 S.E.2d 250, 253 (1972)).

For these reasons, and for the additional reasons well described in the District Court’s September 30, 2016 order dismissing the complaint, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama), 707 F. App'x 952 (11th Cir. 2018).

707 F. App'x 952 (Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of David Bass v. Regions Bank, Inc.
947 F.3d 1352 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)