Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama)

707 F. App'x 952
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2018
Docket16-16849
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 707 F. App'x 952 (Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midwest Feeders, Inc. v. Regions Bank (Inc.) (Alabama), 707 F. App'x 952 (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Midwest Feeders appeals the District Court’s grant of a motion to dismiss its complaint for failure to state a claim. After review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the complaint was properly dismissed because the facts of this case do not give rise to any claim asserted by Midwest Feeders.

For example, it is obvious that Midwest Feeders is not within the class of “ ‘[p]er-son[s] entitled to enforce’ an instrument” within the meaning of O.C.G.A § 11-3-301. Furthermore, its common law conversion claim is clearly preempted by O.C.G.A. § 11-3-420. See Ownbey Enters., Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 457 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1353-54 (N.D. Ga. 2006) (citing Jacobs v. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 125 Ga. App. 462, 188 S.E.2d 250, 253 (1972)).

For these reasons, and for the additional reasons well described in the District Court’s September 30, 2016 order dismissing the complaint, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of David Bass v. Regions Bank, Inc.
947 F.3d 1352 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 F. App'x 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midwest-feeders-inc-v-regions-bank-inc-alabama-ca11-2018.