Midville Fertilizer & Gin Co. v. Wade

118 S.E. 62, 30 Ga. App. 337, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 438
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1923·No. 14436·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The defendant in fi. fa. was estopped, by reason of the recitals in the forthcoming bonds executed by him, from denying that the execution was levied upon the property described in the mortgage. See, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), § 5730; Smith v. Davis, 3 Ga. App. 419 (1) (60 S. E. 199); Farmers Alliance Warehouse Commission Co. v. McElhannon, 98 Ga. 394, 396 (25 S. E. 558); Mullis v. Kennedy, 143 Ga. 618, 620 (85 S. E. 845); Bushy v. Elliott, 22 Ga. App. 391 (2) (95 S. E. 1014).

2. Under the foregoing ruling, the court erred in refusing to strike the second ground of the affidavit of illegality, and the further proceedings in the case were nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodicorth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Midville Fertilizer & Gin Co. v. Wade, 118 S.E. 62, 30 Ga. App. 337, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 438 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

118 S.E. 62 (Midville Fertilizer & Gin Co. v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers Alliance Warehouse & Commission Co. v. McElhannon
25 S.E. 558 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Mullis v. Kennedy
85 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Smith v. Davis
60 S.E. 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Busby & Son v. Elliott
95 S.E. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)