Midtown Plottage Corp. v. Sullivan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Midtown Plottage Corp. v. Sullivan

131 Misc. 473, 227 N.Y.S. 357, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 733

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 Misc. 473 (Midtown Plottage Corp. v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Midtown Plottage Corp. v. Sullivan, 131 Misc. 473, 227 N.Y.S. 357, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Manifestly, in line with our decision in Godwin v. Hauer (N. Y. L. J. Feb. 8, 1924), where under the 1923 amendment to section 125 of the Municipal Court Code the attorney for the successful party refuses to prepare the judgment, the opposing attorney or the clerk, under direction of the court, may prepare the judgment.

[474]*474As none of the orders appealed from are appealable as of course, and no permission to appeal appears in the papers, the appeals must be dismissed.

Appeals dismissed.

All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Levy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI