Midtown Ltd. P'ship v. Tahir-Garrett

Washington Supreme Court

Midtown Ltd. P'ship v. Tahir-Garrett

430 P.3d 262

Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 2018·No. No. 96093-3·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The motion for extension of time is denied. Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The motion for extension of time is denied. Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Midtown Ltd. P'ship v. Tahir-Garrett, 430 P.3d 262 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

430 P.3d 262 (Midtown Ltd. P'ship v. Tahir-Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.