Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker

158 A.D. 914, 143 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D. 914 (Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker, 158 A.D. 914, 143 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, and the motion for a bill of particulars granted to the extent of requiring defendant to furnish particulars of the amounts claimed to have been paid to or on behalf of plaintiff over and above the amounts admitted by plaintiff as alleged in paragraph X of the complaint, and also of the sums claimed to have been paid by defendant to complete the work left uncompleted by plaintiff, without costs to either party in this court or at Special Term. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, without costs to either party. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, and the motion for a bill of particulars granted to the extent of requiring defendant to furnish particulars of the amounts claimed to have been paid to or on behalf of plaintiff over and above the amounts admitted by plaintiff as alleged in paragraph X of the complaint, and also of the sums claimed to have been paid by defendant to complete the work left uncompleted by plaintiff, without costs to either party in this court or at Special Term. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, without costs to either party. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D. 914, 143 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midtown-contracting-co-v-goldsticker-nyappdiv-1913.