Midriff v. State

872 So. 2d 1010
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-2133
StatusPublished

This text of 872 So. 2d 1010 (Midriff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midriff v. State, 872 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bonilla v. State, 766 So.2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding “[i]f the plea agreement was not conditioned on the sentencing guidelines, [an appellant] is not entitled to relief because his sentence is not illegal”).

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonilla v. State
766 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 So. 2d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midriff-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.