Midriff v. State

872 So. 2d 1010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2004·No. No. 5D03-2133·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bonilla v. State, 766 So.2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding “[i]f the plea agreement was not conditioned on the sentencing guidelines, [an appellant] is not entitled to relief because his sentence is not illegal”).

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Midriff v. State, 872 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

872 So. 2d 1010 (Midriff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonilla v. State
766 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)