Midland Valley R. Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Midland Valley R. Co. v. State

1914 OK 188, 140 P. 406, 40 Okla. 660, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 119

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 14, 1914

Docket4148

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK 188 (Midland Valley R. Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Midland Valley R. Co. v. State, 1914 OK 188, 140 P. 406, 40 Okla. 660, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 119 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from order'No. 557 of the Corporation Commission requiring the appellants to build a viaduct over their respective roads at First street, in the city of Tulsa, Okla. Comes the Attorney General and moves to dismiss on the ground that said order is not appealable, citing A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, ante, 138 Pac. 1026, where we held that an order requiring the railway company to construct a viaduct over its tracks and right of way in Guthrie was not an appealable order. As no distinction appears to us in the character of the two orders, inasmuch as both are orders requiring the correction of an abuse which affects the people of a particular community disassociated from the use of a railway for transportation of themselves and their property, and as appellants-have filed no opposition to the motion, the same is sustained on the authority of our opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from order'No. 557 of the Corporation Commission requiring the appellants to build a viaduct over their respective roads at First street, in the city of Tulsa, Okla. Comes the Attorney General and moves to dismiss on the ground that said order is not appealable, citing A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, ante, 138 Pac. 1026, where we held that an order requiring the railway company to construct a viaduct over its tracks and right of way in Guthrie was not an appealable order. As no distinction appears to us in the character of the two orders, inasmuch as both are orders requiring the correction of an abuse which affects the people of a particular community disassociated from the use of a railway for transportation of themselves and their property, and as appellants-have filed no opposition to the motion, the same is sustained on the authority of our opinion in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 188, 140 P. 406, 40 Okla. 660, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midland-valley-r-co-v-state-okla-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack