Midland Park Coal Lumber Co., Inc. v. Terhune
This text of 61 A.2d 76 (Midland Park Coal Lumber Co., Inc. v. Terhune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion below excepting that portion dealing with the authority to regulate by zoning the use of vacant lands in general. Since the land in dispute is to be used in conjunction with presently owned yards and buildings of the appellant, both premises are regarded as a unit and subject to the prevailing zoning restrictions.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Bobine, Heher, Wacheneelb, Burling, Jacobs, . Wells, Dill, Freunb, McLean, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Schettino, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.2d 76, 137 N.J.L. 603, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midland-park-coal-lumber-co-inc-v-terhune-nj-1948.