Midland Corp. v. Levy
184 A. 516, 120 N.J. Eq. 197, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684
Opinion
The decree in chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion there filed. We elide therefrom, however, the parenthetical expression “who does not owe the debt” found near the top of page 79 following the name of defendant Beck.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Midland Corp. v. Levy, 184 A. 516, 120 N.J. Eq. 197, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684 (N.J. 1936).
184 A. 516 (Midland Corp. v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scarano v. Scarano
28 A.2d 425 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)