Midland Corp. v. Levy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Midland Corp. v. Levy

184 A. 516, 120 N.J. Eq. 197, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 24, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 A. 516 (Midland Corp. v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Midland Corp. v. Levy, 184 A. 516, 120 N.J. Eq. 197, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree in chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion there filed. We elide therefrom, however, the parenthetical expression “who does not owe the debt” found near the top of page 79 following the name of defendant Beck.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree in chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion there filed. We elide therefrom, however, the parenthetical expression “who does not owe the debt” found near the top of page 79 following the name of defendant Beck.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A. 516, 120 N.J. Eq. 197, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midland-corp-v-levy-nj-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack