Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Midland City Hotel Co. v. Alexander

Midland City Hotel Co. v. Alexander

80 S.E. 24, 14 Ga. App. 8, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 378
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 25, 1913
Docket5119
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 24 (Midland City Hotel Co. v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midland City Hotel Co. v. Alexander, 80 S.E. 24, 14 Ga. App. 8, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 378 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The plaintiff having failed to show assent or acquiescence on the part of the defendant as to the change in the charter, which varied his original contract of subscription to the capital stock of the corporation, the trial judge did not err in awarding a nonsuit. Knowledge is essential as a. basis for assent, and it will not be held that one has waived a violation of his right when he has no knowledge that it has been violated. The decision in this case is controlled by the ruling of this court in Midland City Hotel Co. v. Gibson, 11 Ga. App. 829 (76 S. E. 600). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. Mitchell
285 S.E.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Midland City Hotel Co. v. Palace Market Co.
87 S.E. 1100 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 24, 14 Ga. App. 8, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midland-city-hotel-co-v-alexander-gactapp-1913.