Midgley v. Goldberg
This text of 2 A.D.3d 735 (Midgley v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to fully expunge all records pertaining to the petitioner’s DNA sample pursuant to Executive Law § 995-c (9) (b) (ii). Motion by the [736]*736petitioner to stay all proceedings in an action entitled People v Midgley, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 1256/02 pending the hearing and determination of this proceeding and motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.
Ordered that the motion to dismiss the proceeding is granted; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the motion for a stay is denied as academic.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.3d 735, 768 N.Y.S.2d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midgley-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-2003.