Midgett v. Kellogg
This text of 127 S.E.2d 261 (Midgett v. Kellogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendants. While the defendants’ well-prepared brief, and the argument of their counsel, present their contentions forcibly, a careful examination of their assignments of error discloses no new question or feature requiring extended discussion. The case was tried in substantial accord with established principles of law in this jurisdiction, and neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear sufficient to justify disturbing the trial below. The verdict and judgment are upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 S.E.2d 261, 257 N.C. 671, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midgett-v-kellogg-nc-1962.