Midfirst Bank v. Burke

82 A.3d 694, 147 Conn. App. 904, 2013 WL 6924207, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 589
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 31, 2013·No. AC 35491·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Midfirst Bank v. Burke, 82 A.3d 694, 147 Conn. App. 904, 2013 WL 6924207, 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 589 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).

82 A.3d 694 (Midfirst Bank v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.