MidFirst Bank v. Ajala
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 298 (MidFirst Bank v. Ajala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Joseph Ajala appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated March 20, 2013, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated July 2, 2012.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, he waived the defenses of lack of standing, statute of limitations, and personal jurisdiction by failing to raise them in his answer or in a pre-answer motion to dismiss (see CPLR 320 [b]; 3211 [a] [5], [8]; [e]; South Point, Inc. v Rana, 139 AD3d 935, 935-936 [2016]; Ferri v Ferri, 71 AD3d 949, 950 [2010]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 298, 146 A.D.3d 875, 44 N.Y.S.3d 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midfirst-bank-v-ajala-nyappdiv-2017.