Midds v. State
133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 382, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 373
This text of 133 S.E. 103 (Midds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Midds v. State, 133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 382, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 373 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized; indeed the jury could not have returned any other verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 103, 35 Ga. App. 382, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midds-v-state-gactapp-1926.