Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC v. Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review

CourtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin
DecidedAugust 6, 2025
Docket2024AP002046
StatusUnpublished

This text of Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC v. Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review (Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC v. Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC v. Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review, (Wis. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. August 6, 2025 A party may file with the Supreme Court a Samuel A. Christensen petition to review an adverse decision by the Clerk of Court of Appeals Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62.

Appeal No. 2024AP2046 Cir. Ct. No. 2023CV1776

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II

MIDDLETON WESTBROOK PROPERTY OWNER LLC AND ENERPAC TOOL GROUP, CORP.,

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V.

VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS BOARD OF REVIEW,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: BRAD SCHIMEL, Judge. Reversed.

Before Neubauer, P.J., Gundrum, and Lazar, JJ.

Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent

or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2024AP2046

¶1 PER CURIAM. The Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review appeals an order granting Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC and Enerpac Tool Group, Corp.’s (collectively, Middleton) petition for writ of certiorari. Middleton petitioned for certiorari review after the Board refused to consider Middleton’s objection to its 2023 property assessment on the basis that Middleton failed to timely provide the assessor with requested income and expense information as required by WIS. STAT. § 70.47(7)(af) (2023-24).1 The circuit court ordered the Board to reconvene and to consider Middleton’s 2023 objection. The Board appeals the court’s order. We reverse the order of the circuit court and affirm the Board’s decision.

¶2 Middleton owns a parcel of real property in the Village that it leases to a commercial tenant. On March 10, 2023, the Village sent Middleton a letter informing it that the Village was revaluing all property in the Village for the January 1, 2023 assessment year. The letter advised Middleton that “[a]s an owner or manager of income producing property, you are aware of the impact that economic factors have on property values.” The letter asked Middleton to complete and return enclosed income and expense data forms “pertaining to the rental and operating of the building.” The letter warned that “[a]n owner may lose the right to appeal to the Board of Review without providing the Assessor’s Office with the requested information.” Middleton did not respond to the Village’s request.

¶3 By notice dated June 14, 2023, the Village advised the public, in part, that if any taxpayer wanted to object to its 2023 assessment, the Village’s board of review would meet on July 27, 2023. The notice warned, “Please be advised of the following requirements to appear before the board of review and procedural

1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2023-24 version.

2 No. 2024AP2046

requirements if appearing before the Board of Review.” As relevant, the notice stated:

No person may appear before the Board of Review, testify to the Board of Review by telephone, or object to a valuation if that valuation was made by the assessor or the objector using the income method of valuation, unless no later than 7 days before the first meeting of the board, the person supplies the assessor with all the information about income and expenses that the assessor requests, as specified in the Assessor’s Manual under [WIS. STAT. §] 73.03(2a)[.]

¶4 On July 24, 2023, three days before the Board’s meeting, Middleton objected to its 2023 assessment and provided the Board with a single-property appraisal of the property that valued the property using, in part, an income approach. In response, the Board advised Middleton that “your objection will not be scheduled for a hearing.” The Board explained that the Wisconsin statutes provided, in part:

No person may appear before the board of review, testify to the board by telephone or object to a valuation; if that valuation was made by the assessor or the objector using the income method; unless no later than 7 days before the first meeting of the board of review the person supplies to the assessor all of the information about income and expenses, as specified in the manual under [WIS. STAT. §] 73.03(2a), that the assessor requests.

WIS. STAT. § 70.47(7)(af). The Board further advised:

The Village assessor utilized the income method to determine the valuation of your property and sent the enclosed letter on March 10 requesting income and expense information. The letter states that a property owner may lose the right to appeal to the Board of Review if the requested information is not provided. In addition, first-class notices dated April 26 and June 14 were published containing the language in WIS. STAT. § 70.47(af) [sic] above.

Because you did not provide the income and expense information as requested by the Village Assessor prior to the close of business on July 17, 2023, WIS. STAT. § 70.47(af) [sic] prohibits you from appearing before the Board of

3 No. 2024AP2046

Review to testify and object to the value of the subject property.

¶5 In response, Middleton petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review, and the court ultimately ordered the Board to reconvene and consider Middleton’s 2023 objection. The Board now appeals.

¶6 “On appeal of a circuit court certiorari decision, we review the decision of the local governmental body, not the decision of the circuit court.” Miller v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vill. of Lyndon Station, 2022 WI App 51, ¶18, 404 Wis. 2d 539, 980 N.W.2d 295. Our inquiry is limited

to the record before the board and addresses only whether the board’s actions were: (1) within its jurisdiction; (2) according to law; (3) arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) supported by evidence such that the board might reasonably make the order or determination in question.

State ex rel. City of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Rev., 2021 WI 89, ¶19, 399 Wis. 2d 696, 967 N.W.2d 460.

¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 70.47(7)(af) plainly and unambiguously provides that no person may appear before the board or object to a valuation:

if that valuation was made by the assessor or the objector using the income method; unless no later than 7 days before the first meeting of the board of review the person supplies to the assessor all of the information about income and expenses, as specified in the manual under [WIS. STAT. §] 73.03(2a),[2] that the assessor requests.

2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 73.03(2a) requires the department of revenue to prepare and publish an assessment manual that “shall discuss and illustrate accepted assessment methods, techniques and practices.” Assessors, in turn, are required to value real property “in the manner specified in the Wisconsin property assessment manual … from actual view or from the best information that the assessor can practicably obtain, at the full value which could ordinarily be obtained therefor at private sale.” WIS. STAT. § 70.32(1).

4 No. 2024AP2046

¶8 Here, the Village’s March 10, 2023 letter put Middleton on notice that it was going to be relying on an income valuation method to derive Middleton’s 2023 property assessment. The letter referred to Middleton as an owner of “income producing property” and told Middleton it needed the data it was requesting “to assist in arriving at fair and equitable values for the 2023 assessment year.” The letter stated the assessor was requesting “information pertaining to the rental and operation of the building” and included a fill-in form for Middleton to provide information related to its building’s income and expenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
2001 WI 92 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2001)
City of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha Board of Review
2021 WI 89 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2021)
Thomas G. Miller v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Lyndon Station
2022 WI App 51 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Middleton Westbrook Property Owner LLC v. Village of Menomonee Falls Board of Review, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-westbrook-property-owner-llc-v-village-of-menomonee-falls-board-wisctapp-2025.