Middleton v. Washington State Department of Corrections Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Middleton v. Washington State Department of Corrections Corp.

30 F. App'x 219

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2002·No. No. 02-6021·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who are Washington state inmates, appeal the district court’s order dismissing their petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) for improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Middleton v. Washington State Dep’t of Corr. Corp., No. CA-01-867 (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who are Washington state inmates, appeal the district court’s order dismissing their petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) for improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Middleton v. Washington State Dep’t of Corr. Corp., No. CA-01-867 (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Middleton v. Washington State Department of Corrections Corp., 30 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 219 (Middleton v. Washington State Department of Corrections Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related