Middleton v. State

112 S.W.2d 190, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 909
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 1938
DocketNo. 19269
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.W.2d 190 (Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middleton v. State, 112 S.W.2d 190, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 909 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts, or bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.W.2d 190, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.