Middleton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Middleton v. State

111 S.E. 71, 28 Ga. App. 348, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 502

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1922

Docket13183

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 71 (Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middleton v. State, 111 S.E. 71, 28 Ga. App. 348, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 502 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted cf the offense of simple larceny. His sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction. There was evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted cf the offense of simple larceny. His sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction. There was evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 71, 28 Ga. App. 348, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-state-gactapp-1922.