Middleton v. State

135 S.E.2d 276, 219 Ga. 684, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 364
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 30, 1964
Docket22333
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E.2d 276 (Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middleton v. State, 135 S.E.2d 276, 219 Ga. 684, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 364 (Ga. 1964).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. The decision in Clark v. State, ante, controls adversely to these plaintiffs in error, the exception to the judgment sustaining the constitutionality of Ga. L. 1960, p. 142 (Code Ann. § 26-3005) as against the demurrer which contended that the law offended the Fourteenth Amendment.

2. There is no brief of evidence in this record, and since the merits of the general grounds of the motion for new trial and [685]*685motion to acquit can be determined only by weighing the evidence, it follows that, as to these grounds, the judgment overruling them must be affirmed. Jones v. Gate City Lodge No. 54, 171 Ga. 844 (156 SE 672); Perry v. Perry, 188 Ga. 477 (4 SE2d 184).

Argued January 14, 1964 Decided January 30, 1964 Rehearing denied February 11,1964. B. Clarence Mayfield, E. H. Gadsden, for plaintiffs in error. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor, R. E. Barker, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Gate City Lodge No. 54
156 S.E. 672 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Perry v. Perry
4 S.E.2d 184 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E.2d 276, 219 Ga. 684, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-state-ga-1964.