Middleton v. State
770 So. 2d 1257, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14543, 2000 WL 1651322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Middleton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 792 →
Opinion
The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of the decisions in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000,) and Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. June 1, 2000).
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Middleton v. State, 770 So. 2d 1257, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14543, 2000 WL 1651322 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
770 So. 2d 1257 (Middleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)