Middleton v. Sinclair
This text of 17 F. Cas. 275 (Middleton v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
And
(nem. con.) so instructed them; and also at the prayer of Mr. Bradley, for plaintiff, further instructed them, that if from the evidence they should be of opinion that the said deed was made bond, fide, and without any intent to defeat or defraud the creditors of the said S. C. Middleton, and for a valuable consideration; and the said Samuel Middleton (the son) was jointly in possession of the said land, with the said Smallwood C. Middleton after the making of the said deed, then the plaintiffs are entitled to recover.
Verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. Cas. 275, 5 Cranch 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-sinclair-circtddc-1838.