Middleton v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Middleton v. Parker

94 S.E. 820, 21 Ga. App. 538, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 394

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1918

Docket8625

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 820 (Middleton v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middleton v. Parker, 94 S.E. 820, 21 Ga. App. 538, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 394 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. All motions for continuances are addressed to the sound discretion of the court. Leathers v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211 (63 S. E. 1118). On hearing evidence upon the motion to continue, the court did not abuse its discretion in overruling and denying the motion.

2. In view of the note of the trial judge in approving the grounds of the motion for a new trial, the rulings upon the admissibility of evidence were not error.

3. The charge of the court was full and fair, and the evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial upon any of the grounds of error assigned; neither did the court err in overruling the demurrer of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI