Middleton v. New York Electric Lines Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Middleton v. New York Electric Lines Co.

143 A.D. 950, 128 N.Y.S. 1135

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1911·Published

Opinion

Without passing upon the merits of the controversy, the order continuing the injunction pendente lite is affirmed, on argument, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on condition that the' plaintiff be ready for trial whenever the case is moved for trial by the defendants, with the privilege also of moving for the trial thereof on his part. (See Heim v. New York Stock Exchange, 138 App. Div. 96, and authorities cited.) Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr and Woodward, JJ., concurred; Rich; J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Without passing upon the merits of the controversy, the order continuing the injunction pendente lite is affirmed, on argument, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on condition that the' plaintiff be ready for trial whenever the case is moved for trial by the defendants, with the privilege also of moving for the trial thereof on his part. (See Heim v. New York Stock Exchange, 138 App. Div. 96, and authorities cited.) Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr and Woodward, JJ., concurred; Rich; J., taking no part.

Middleton v. New York Electric Lines Co., 143 A.D. 950, 128 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

143 A.D. 950 (Middleton v. New York Electric Lines Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related