Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC

Fourth Circuit

Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC

445 F. App'x 651

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1385

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F. App'x 651 (Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC, 445 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Antonio Middleton appeals the district court’s orders: adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC, No. 2:08-cv-03256-CWH (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2011). We grant the motion to file an amended informal brief and deny the motions for preparation of a transcript at government expense and for entry of default. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Antonio Middleton appeals the district court’s orders: adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC, No. 2:08-cv-03256-CWH (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2011). We grant the motion to file an amended informal brief and deny the motions for preparation of a transcript at government expense and for entry of default. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-motley-rice-llc-ca4-2011.