Middleton v. Frank

86 So. 207, 80 Fla. 334
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 So. 207 (Middleton v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middleton v. Frank, 86 So. 207, 80 Fla. 334 (Fla. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being how advised of its judgment to be given in the premises; it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be. and the same is hereby affirmed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayes v. Hale
89 So. 364 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 207, 80 Fla. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-frank-fla-1920.