Middleton v. Comm'r
This text of 2002 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 313 (Middleton v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On August 19, 2992, petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration, with respect to the
As to the remainder of the matters in the Court's opinion that petitioner contends should be reconsidered, the Court, after a review of the documents filed by the pearties and the record in this case, concludes that petitioner is not entitled to any relief other than the items that have been conceded by respondent. With the exception of the items conceded by respondent, we find the allegations and argument in petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration*314 to be without merit and based on petitioner's misunderstanding of the law, procedure, and the record in this case.
Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is granted to the extent that the Court's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion filed June 28, 2002 ( On page 5, delete the last complete sentence on the page, which reads "Petitioner failed to report interest income of $ 1,313 on his original 1991 income tax return." On pages 6 and 7, beginning with the forth line from the bottom of page 6, delete the remainder of the paragragh which reads "Based upon the bank deposits analysis, respondent also determined that petitioner failed to report other income of $ 104,069. Respondent's agent's bank deposits analysis reflected total 1990 bank deposits of $ 467,992.06. The net unexplained bank deposits of $ 104,069 was derived by eliminating the follow(ing) amounts from total bank deposits: Income reported on petitioner's original return $ 15,130; net Medicaid payment of $ 202,084.68 (total payments of $ 219,656.68 less $ 17,572 administrative fees); and specific items of identified income totaling $ 146,708.25*315 (represented by the $ 129,136.25 taxi leasing income and $ 17,572 administrative fees)." On page 13, footnote 3, line 3, delete the phrase which reads "and $ 104,069 unexplained deposits determined by respondent". On page 15, in the first and second line from the bottom of the page, delete the phrase which reads "and he also omitted $ 1,313 in interest income". On page 18, 8th line from the bottom of the page delete the words "the omitted", which are the first two words. On page 19, delete the first complete sentence, which reads "At trial, petitioner did not dispute the omission of $ 1,313 of interest income."
ORDERED that the Court's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion, filed June 28, 2002 (
ORDERED that the Court's Notice of Filing Of Computation under
ORDERED that the parties in this case shall file, on or before January 7, 2003, a computation under
(Singed) Joel Gerber
Joel Gerber, Judge
Dated: Washington, D.C.
November 7, 2002
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-commr-tax-2002.