Middleton v. Carter

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Middleton v. Carter

68 A. 765, 73 N.J. Eq. 641, 3 Buchanan 641, 1907 N.J. Prerog. Ct. LEXIS 13

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedDecember 20, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A. 765 (Middleton v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middleton v. Carter, 68 A. 765, 73 N.J. Eq. 641, 3 Buchanan 641, 1907 N.J. Prerog. Ct. LEXIS 13 (N.J. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Magie, Ordinary.

The matter brought up by this appeal relates to the account of appellant as administrator of the estate of Ida Mildred Carter, deceased. Appellant had been appointed her administrator, and had been removed from his office, and respondent had then been appointed substituted administrator.

The account of appellant, filed under the order of removal, had been excepted to upon substantially the same grounds as were taken in the matter of the administration of the estate of William L. Carter, deceased. They presented the same questions, and were decided by the orphans court upon the same grounds as were those interposed to the other proceeding. The examination of that case has led to the affirmance of the decree therein upon the exceptions there interposed, and for like reasons the decree of the orphans court in this case is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magie, Ordinary.

The matter brought up by this appeal relates to the account of appellant as administrator of the estate of Ida Mildred Carter, deceased. Appellant had been appointed her administrator, and had been removed from his office, and respondent had then been appointed substituted administrator.

The account of appellant, filed under the order of removal, had been excepted to upon substantially the same grounds as were taken in the matter of the administration of the estate of William L. Carter, deceased. They presented the same questions, and were decided by the orphans court upon the same grounds as were those interposed to the other proceeding. The examination of that case has led to the affirmance of the decree therein upon the exceptions there interposed, and for like reasons the decree of the orphans court in this case is also affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A. 765, 73 N.J. Eq. 641, 3 Buchanan 641, 1907 N.J. Prerog. Ct. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-carter-njsuperctappdiv-1907.