Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC

Fourth Circuit

Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC

675 F. App'x 307

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2017·No. No. 16-2097·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ervin Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Brock & Scott PLLC, No. 1:16-cv-01085-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ervin Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Brock & Scott PLLC, No. 1:16-cv-01085-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC, 675 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 307 (Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related