Middleton v. Brisbane

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Middleton v. Brisbane

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 24, 1774

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Middleton v. Brisbane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middleton v. Brisbane, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1774).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. John Rutledge on Behalf of the Defendants acquainted the Court that the Register in drawing up the Order of the 26 of March 1771 in this Cause had omitted Part of the Direction of the Court to wit That the Complainant should assign over the Bonds therein mentioned to the said Henry Middleton for the Purposes set forth in the said Order and thereupon moved and it is ordered that the Complainant do within Ten Days execute a proper Assignment of the said Bonds to the said Henry Middleton for the Purposes mentioned in said Order and that he impowered to collect the Interest [623]*623Money due on the said Bonds and any of the Debts which may appear precarious.

At a Court of Chancery held in the Council Chamber at Charles town on Wednesday the 24. March 1774.

Present, His Honor, the Lieutenant Governor; Sir Egerton Leigh, Bar-ronet; Thomas Skottowe, Thomas Knox Gordon; William Henry Drayton; William Burrows Esq. Master.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. John Rutledge on Behalf of the Defendants acquainted the Court that the Register in drawing up the Order of the 26 of March 1771 in this Cause had omitted Part of the Direction of the Court to wit That the Complainant should assign over the Bonds therein mentioned to the said Henry Middleton for the Purposes set forth in the said Order and thereupon moved and it is ordered that the Complainant do within Ten Days execute a proper Assignment of the said Bonds to the said Henry Middleton for the Purposes mentioned in said Order and that he impowered to collect the Interest [623]*623Money due on the said Bonds and any of the Debts which may appear precarious.

At a Court of Chancery held in the Council Chamber at Charles town on Wednesday the 24. March 1774.

Present, His Honor, the Lieutenant Governor; Sir Egerton Leigh, Bar-ronet; Thomas Skottowe, Thomas Knox Gordon; William Henry Drayton; William Burrows Esq. Master.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-brisbane-ctchansc-1774.