Middleton v. Boardman
148 N.E. 701, 240 N.Y. 552, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 770
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the answer to the question certified rests in the discretion of the Supreme Court and, therefore, cannot be reviewed by us.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Middleton v. Boardman, 148 N.E. 701, 240 N.Y. 552, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 770 (N.Y. 1925).
148 N.E. 701 (Middleton v. Boardman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Casolaro v. Blau
4 Misc. 2d 206 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.
190 Misc. 700 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Weihe v. Long Island Railroad
271 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Parsons v. Moss
171 Misc. 828 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Parker v. Burgoyne
167 Misc. 542 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1938)
Weiner v. J. I. Hass, Inc.
158 Misc. 181 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)
Vincent v. Van Blooys
248 N.W. 633 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Drake v. Herrman
185 N.E. 685 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Davidson v. Newman
144 Misc. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)
Sherman Sylvester Scheuer Building Corp. v. Krull
142 Misc. 189 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1931)
Maher v. Orange & Rockland Electric Co.
141 Misc. 573 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Schonhous v. Weiner
138 Misc. 759 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Didinsky v. Polak
228 A.D. 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
220 A.D. 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Enequist v. Brooklyn City Railroad
216 A.D. 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)