Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Middleton v. Baker

Middleton v. Baker

348 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2011 WL 4037038
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 13, 2011
DocketED 95868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 130 (Middleton v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middleton v. Baker, 348 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2011 WL 4037038 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Middleton appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Pamela E. Baker on his petition for negligence and premises liability as a result of his injuries from being attacked by a dog owned by individuals renting Baker’s property. We find that the trial court did not err in *131 granting summary judgment in favor of Baker.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mueller v. State
348 S.W.3d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2011 WL 4037038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-baker-moctapp-2011.