Middleton v. Baker

348 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2011 WL 4037038
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Middleton appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Pamela E. Baker on his petition for negligence and premises liability as a result of his injuries from being attacked by a dog owned by individuals renting Baker’s property. We find that the trial court did not err in *131 granting summary judgment in favor of Baker.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Middleton v. Baker, 348 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2011 WL 4037038 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 130 (Middleton v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mueller v. State
348 S.W.3d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)