Middleton v. Baker
Opinion
ORDER
Jessie Middleton appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Pamela E. Baker on his petition for negligence and premises liability as a result of his injuries from being attacked by a dog owned by individuals renting Baker’s property. We find that the trial court did not err in *131 granting summary judgment in favor of Baker.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
348 S.W.3d 130 (Middleton v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.