Middleton, Terrill
This text of Middleton, Terrill (Middleton, Terrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,700-01
EX PARTE TERRILL MIDDLETON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W10-72351-S(A) IN THE 282ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of
aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years.
The Applicant alleges, among other things, that his plea was involuntary and that he received
ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel in this case. The State responds to Applicant’s
allegations, in pertinent part:
The State contends that trial and appellate counsel for Applicant provided representation that fell within the wide range of reasonable assistance [cite omitted]. The State, however, recognizes that this Court may desire additional evidence regarding trial and appellate counsel’s representation of Applicant. If so, the State requests that this Court gather evidence, as is customary, by way of affidavit from both counsel or hold an evidentiary hearing should the Court deem such to be necessary.
On July 7, 2014, a timely order designating issues was signed by the trial court. The habeas
record was then properly forwarded to this Court pursuant to TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4 (b)(5), but without
the designated issues being resolved by the trial court.1 We remand this application to the 282nd
Judicial District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary
investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 04, 2015 Do not publish
1 Under TEX . R. APP . P. 73.5, a trial court may request an extension of time to resolve designated issues by filing a motion before the expiration of 180 days from the date of the receipt of the application by the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Middleton, Terrill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-terrill-texcrimapp-2015.