Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

882 A.2d 673, 275 Conn. 911

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 12, 2005

DocketSC 17493

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 882 A.2d 673 (Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 882 A.2d 673, 275 Conn. 911 (Colo. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 482 (AC 25437), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to subrogation for the fire loss under the circumstances of this case?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 482 (AC 25437), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to subrogation for the fire loss under the circumstances of this case?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

882 A.2d 673, 275 Conn. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middlesex-mutual-assurance-co-v-vaszil-conn-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack