Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil
882 A.2d 673, 275 Conn. 911
Opinion
The petition by the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 482 (AC 25437), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to subrogation for the fire loss under the circumstances of this case?”
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 882 A.2d 673, 275 Conn. 911 (Colo. 2005).
882 A.2d 673 (Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil
900 A.2d 513 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)