Middlesex County Sewer. Auth. v. Bor. of Middlesex

190 A.2d 205, 79 N.J. Super. 24
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided April 16, 1963·Published

Opinion

79 N.J. Super. 24 (1963)
190 A.2d 205

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 8, 1963.
Decided April 16, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

Mr. Karl R. Meyertons argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Rafferty & Blacher, attorneys for appellant Borough of Middlesex; Mr. Louis J. Milano, attorney for appellant Borough of South River; Mr. Elia Barbati, Jr., attorney for appellants Borough of Bound Brook and Borough of South *25 Bound Brook; Mr. John J. Rafferty, of counsel for all appellants).

Mr. Edward J. Johnson, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Johnson & Johnson, attorneys; Mr. Edward J. Johnson, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 74 N.J. Super. 591 (Law Div. 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Middlesex County Sewer. Auth. v. Bor. of Middlesex, 190 A.2d 205, 79 N.J. Super. 24 (N.J. Ct. App. 1963).

190 A.2d 205 (Middlesex County Sewer. Auth. v. Bor. of Middlesex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MIDDLESEX CTY. SEWER. AUTH. v. Bor. of Middlesex
181 A.2d 818 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. Borough of Middlesex
190 A.2d 205 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)