Middlebrooks v. Pugh

175 S.E. 16, 179 Ga. 64, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 215
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1934
DocketNo. 10006
StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E. 16 (Middlebrooks v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middlebrooks v. Pugh, 175 S.E. 16, 179 Ga. 64, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 215 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

In the petition for certiorari error is assigned on the ruling of the Court of Appeals as contained in the second division of the decision by that court, 47 Ga. App. 528 (171 S. E. 160). Other complaints in the petition are based on petitioner’s deductions from the ruling just mentioned, as applied to the facts of the ease. After careful examination of the petition, no merit is found in any of the assignments of error. The writ of certiorari was improvidently granted, and must be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pugh v. Middlebrooks
171 S.E. 160 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 S.E. 16, 179 Ga. 64, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middlebrooks-v-pugh-ga-1934.