Middlebrooks v. Carson

99 S.E. 151, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 275
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 22, 1919
Docket10171
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 151 (Middlebrooks v. Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middlebrooks v. Carson, 99 S.E. 151, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “The giving of a replevy bond by the defendant in attachment converted the suit from an action in rem to an action in personam, and, as completely authorized the rendition of a common-law judgment against the defendant in attachment as if the action had been begun in the usual form, followed by personal service.” Philip Carey Co. v. Sheppard, 19 Ga. App. 368 (91 S. E. 444). See Civil Code (1910), § 5113; Cincinnati Ry. Co. v. Pless, 3 Ga. App. 400 (1), 403 (60 S. E. 8), and cases cited; Mitchell v. Perry, 145 Ga. 233 (88 S. E. 930).

2. The court properly refused to set aside the judgment.

3. The motion to award damages against the plaintiff in error, for bringing up the case, is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Attachment; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. September 24, 1918. Dickson & Camp, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Culpepper, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Universal Match Corp. v. Hendricks
94 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Hensley v. Minehan
114 S.E. 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 151, 23 Ga. App. 665, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middlebrooks-v-carson-gactapp-1919.