Middle Vil. Chiropractic v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 7, 2017·No. 2017 NYSlipOp 50433(U)·Published

Opinion



Middle Village Chiropractic, as Assignee of Anabel Serrano, Respondent,

against

GEICO General Insurance Co., Appellant.

The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein, Lawrence Chanice, Esq., for appellant.

The Odierno Law Firm, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered July 27, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,549.58.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,549.58.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the Civil Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's application to adjourn the trial to enable it to secure the attendance of expert witnesses. For the reasons stated in Middle Village Chiropractic, as Assignee of Artur Mujaxhi v Geico Gen. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d __, 2017 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2015-2880 Q C]), decided herewith), the judgment is affirmed.

Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.


ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk

Decision Date: April 07, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Middle Vil. Chiropractic v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Middle Vil. Chiropractic v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. (Middle Vil. Chiropractic v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.