Middaugh v. State
This text of 132 N.E. 678 (Middaugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted in the city court of Indianapolis of a violation of the Prohibition Law. Acts 1917 p. 15, §8356a et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918.. He appealed to the criminal court of Marion county, was tried by jury and again convicted.
He moved the court to withhold' from the jury, on their retirement, “the affidavit, transcript of appeal and all other papers in this case,” which motion the court sustained, “as to all papers except affidavit.” He excepted to this ruling and 'on this predicates error.
It is proper to permit the jury to take with them the [374]*374affidavit, or indictment, when they retire to deliberate on their verdict. Stout v. State (1883), 90 Ind. 1; Masterson v. State (1896), 144 Ind. 240, 43 N. E. 138. Provided, however, that there is nothing of a prejudicial character attached thereto, or indorsed thereon. McNulty v. State (1919), 189 Ind. 88, 125 N. E. 41, and authorities there cited; Staub v. State (1919), 188 Ind. 683, 125 N. E. 399, and authorities there cited.
It is not made to appéar by the record in the instant case that there was anything attached to the affidavit, or indorsed thereon. •
The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 N.E. 678, 191 Ind. 373, 1921 Ind. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middaugh-v-state-ind-1921.