MidCap Media Finance, LLC v. Pathway Data, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Texas
DecidedFebruary 18, 2020
Docket1:15-cv-00060
StatusUnknown

This text of MidCap Media Finance, LLC v. Pathway Data, Inc. (MidCap Media Finance, LLC v. Pathway Data, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MidCap Media Finance, LLC v. Pathway Data, Inc., (W.D. Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MIDCAP MEDIA FINANCE, LLC § § V. § 1:15-cv-0060 AWA § PATHWAY DATA, INC., et al. § FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER On July 9, 2019, the Fifth Circuit remanded this case for the Court “to determine whether it has diversity jurisdiction. . . .” Dkt. No. 110. In accordance with the Circuit Court’s mandate, the parties have been permitted to amend their allegations and supplement the record. The parties stipulated to the fact that Pathway Data, Inc. is a citizen of Nevada and David Coulter is a citizen of California (Dkt. No. 117 at ¶ 6), but the Defendants disputed the citizenship of MidCap Media Finance, LLC (“MidCap”). The citizenship of an LLC is determined by the citizenship of all of its members,1 thus the inquiry requires determining the citizenship of each member within the MidCap chain of membership on the date this suit was filed.2 Following several months of jurisdictional discovery,3 the Court narrowed the jurisdictional question down to one specific issue: whether the entity “Las Lomas Trust” was a member within the MidCap Media Finance, LLC ownership structure on January 23, 2015. See Dkt. No. 130.

1 See Settlement Funding, LLC v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd., 851 F.3d 530, 536 (5th Cir. 2017). 2 Citizenship for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction is determined based on the date the action commenced. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 570 (2004). MidCap filed its original complaint on January 23, 2015. Dkt. No. 1. 3 The undersigned’s orders issued on October 4, 2019 and December 9, 2019 document in detail the nature of the discovery conducted. Dkt. Nos. 125 and 130. On January 10, 2020, the Court held a final evidentiary hearing on this issue. After considering all of the evidence before it, the Court finds that the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that when suit was filed (and continuing all the way through to the present) there was/is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties in this case, and the Court has subject matter

jurisdiction over this dispute. At the hearing, the Court heard the testimony of two witnesses—Joe Black, called by MidCap, and investigator Michael Collins, called by Pathway. Additionally, each side submitted a number of exhibits. Based on that evidence, the Court makes the following findings: 1. Joe Black is a lifelong resident of Atlanta, Georgia and a citizen of Georgia. Joe provided this information through a declaration under oath, (Dkt. No. 116-3) and his brother testified to this information at the evidentiary hearing. MidCap has also produced Joe Black’s driver’s license

documenting his Georgia address. Dkt. No. 128-6. All of this evidence is undisputed, and Pathway offered no contrary evidence. The Court therefore finds that Joe Black was a citizen of Georgia on January 23, 2015. 2. Jeff Black has lived and worked in Austin, Texas since 2007 and is a citizen of Texas. Jeff testified to this information at the evidentiary hearing and previously through a declaration made under oath. Dkt. No. 116-2. MidCap has produced Jeff Black’s driver’s license documenting his Texas address. Dkt. No. 137-1. Once again, all of this evidence is undisputed, and Pathway offered no contrary evidence. The Court therefore finds that Jeff Black was a citizen of Texas on January

23, 2015. 3. MidCap submitted concrete evidence of its membership structure on January 23, 2015, the date suit was filed. The significant documentary evidence and testimony demonstrates that the 2 entities in the MidCap Media Finance, LLC structure ultimately all trace back to Jeff and Joe Black, individually. Dkt. No. 130. See Dkt. No. 137-3. 4. Specifically, the records show that on January 23, 2015, there were three entities upstream of MidCap Media Finance, LLC. See Dkt. No. 137-3. Those are: (a) MidCap Media Finance, LLC (the Plaintiff) had two members: MidCap Management, LLC and MidCap Credit & Capital, LLC. (b) MidCap Management, LLC’s members were MidCap Credit & Capital, LLC and BlackCo Capital & Consulting, LLC. (c) MidCap Credit & Capital, LLC’s members were Jeff Black and BlackCo Capital & Consulting. (d) BlackCo Capital & Consulting, LLC’s members were Jeff and Joe Black. Graphically, the structure on January 23, 2015 was: members

members

\

As already noted, it is undisputed that on January 23, 2015, Jeff Black was a citizen of Texas, and Joe Black was a citizen of Georgia. Thus, the Court finds that at the time suit was filed, MidCap Media Finance, LLC was a citizen of Texas and Georgia. 5. The only factual argument Pathway has mustered to question these findings relates to an

entity called the Las Lomas Trust, which for a time was a member of one of the upstream MidCap entities, MidCap Capital & Credit, LLC. During discovery after remand, Pathway aggressively sought to demonstrate that, notwithstanding documents indicating otherwise, the Las Lomas Trust might have maintained its ownership interest in MidCap Capital & Credit all the way through the time suit was filed. Specifically, in the first stages of discovery MidCap produced the agreement through which the Las Lomas Trust redeemed its membership, which stated it was “effective as of” January 1, 2014. This led Pathway to question what the actual closing date was, and whether the

actual transfer of the Las Lomas Trust’s membership might have taken place after this suit was filed on January 23, 2015 (making the Trust’s citizenship relevant). The Court thus permitted additional discovery related to that question, the fruits of which were admitted, and testified to, at the evidentiary hearing. See Dkt. No. 137-2; Dkt. No. 138-1; Dkt. No. 138-3. 6. The undisputed evidence was that the Trust divested any membership interest in MidCap Capital & Credit months before the date suit was filed. Specifically, the following evidence clearly documents the actual date of redemption of the Trust’s membership was August 1, 2014: (a) a document titled “Agreement for Redemption of Membership Interest” providing the terms of the redemption, and effective date of January 1, 2014. Dkt. No. 137-2 at 120. (b) two notarized, sworn affidavits of non-parties, dated April 21, 2014, stating that Jeff Black had been removed as Investment Trustee of the Trust. Dkt. No. 137-2 at 118, 133.

4 (c) a Wells Fargo wire transfer form called “Wire Transfer Activity Detail” dated August 1, 2014, documenting a transfer of funds from MidCap Capital & Credit, LLC to the Las Lomas Trust. The form also contains the notes “Repay Member loan” and “MCC Redempt LLT’s Member Interest.” Dkt. No. 137-2 at 117. 6. When these documents were produced during discovery, MidCap redacted the names of individuals (such as the beneficiary of the Trust), and the total consideration paid, to protect the Trust’s settlors and beneficiaries’ privacy, since that information was irrelevant to the jurisdictional analysis. Pathway objected to this, and tried to argue that the redactions cast doubt on MidCap’s claim that the Trust had divested its interest in the MidCap entity prior to the date this suit was filed. The Court rejected those arguments and declined to compel the Trust or MidCap to provide the redacted names.4 7. Pathway continued to pursue this argument at the evidentiary hearing, specifically arguing that because the Redemption Agreement provides that the redemption of interest was conditioned on the Trust’s receipt of the full redemption price, with the redaction it was impossible to conclude that the full amount was in fact transferred in the August 1, 2014 wire transfer. Dkt. No. 134 at 2-5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.
541 U.S. 567 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MidCap Media Finance, LLC v. Pathway Data, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midcap-media-finance-llc-v-pathway-data-inc-txwd-2020.