Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson

34 N.W.2d 738, 227 Minn. 24, 1948 Minn. LEXIS 635

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 30, 1948

DocketNo. 34,636.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 34 N.W.2d 738 (Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mid-West Wine Co. Inc. v. Ericson, 34 N.W.2d 738, 227 Minn. 24, 1948 Minn. LEXIS 635 (Mich. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

This is an action by a taxpayer and licensee under L. 1947, c. 528, to restrain defendant as state liquor control commissioner from approving manifests for the importation into this state of wines for resale in this state by concerns not licensed under c. 528 to manufacture or wholesale wines. A number of amici curiae, representing wholesalers and manufacturers of intoxicating liquors holding unexpired licenses issued under M. S. A. 340.11 prior to the enactment *25 of c. 528, participated in the argument before the trial court in support of the contention of defendant and, by order of this court, were granted permission to file a joint brief on this appeal.

L. 1947, c. 528, amended M. S. A. 340.11, subd. 12, and the question presented is whether c. 528 should be construed as prohibiting holders of licenses acquired prior to its passage under § 340.11, subd. 12, from selling wine from and after the passage of c. 528, except for the fact that the question has now become moot by virtue of two circumstances.

First, the court will take judicial notice of the fact that the licenses issued under § 340.11, subd. 12, all expired prior to June 30, 1948, so there is no real controversy remaining between the parties which could be decided.

Second, L. 1947, c. 528, is declared unconstitutional by this court in the companion case of George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1, 34 N. W. (2d) 725, filed herewith. In view of that holding, it is apparent on the face of plaintiff’s complaint that it can have no cause of action.

It is well settled that if, pending an appeal, an event occurs which renders it impossible to grant any relief or which makes a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed. 1 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 463.

Appeal dismissed as presenting a moot question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

This is an action by a taxpayer and licensee under L. 1947, c. 528, to restrain defendant as state liquor control commissioner from approving manifests for the importation into this state of wines for resale in this state by concerns not licensed under c. 528 to manufacture or wholesale wines. A number of amici curiae, representing wholesalers and manufacturers of intoxicating liquors holding unexpired licenses issued under M. S. A. 340.11 prior to the enactment *25 of c. 528, participated in the argument before the trial court in support of the contention of defendant and, by order of this court, were granted permission to file a joint brief on this appeal.

L. 1947, c. 528, amended M. S. A. 340.11, subd. 12, and the question presented is whether c. 528 should be construed as prohibiting holders of licenses acquired prior to its passage under § 340.11, subd. 12, from selling wine from and after the passage of c. 528, except for the fact that the question has now become moot by virtue of two circumstances.

First, the court will take judicial notice of the fact that the licenses issued under § 340.11, subd. 12, all expired prior to June 30, 1948, so there is no real controversy remaining between the parties which could be decided.

Second, L. 1947, c. 528, is declared unconstitutional by this court in the companion case of George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 227 Minn. 1, 34 N. W. (2d) 725, filed herewith. In view of that holding, it is apparent on the face of plaintiff’s complaint that it can have no cause of action.

It is well settled that if, pending an appeal, an event occurs which renders it impossible to grant any relief or which makes a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed. 1 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 463.

Appeal dismissed as presenting a moot question.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.W.2d 738, 227 Minn. 24, 1948 Minn. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-west-wine-co-inc-v-ericson-minn-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack