Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Anderson

266 S.W.2d 333, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 811

DecidedFebruary 19, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 266 S.W.2d 333 (Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. Anderson, 266 S.W.2d 333, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 811 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Boone Circuit Court, Honorable Ward Yager, Judge.

The judgment is for $1,500 damages for loss of use of lakes as a fishing resort because of pollution by road oil escaping from the defendant’s pipe line.

The court concludes there was no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Boone Circuit Court, Honorable Ward Yager, Judge.

The judgment is for $1,500 damages for loss of use of lakes as a fishing resort because of pollution by road oil escaping from the defendant’s pipe line.

The court concludes there was no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.2d 333, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-valley-pipeline-co-v-anderson-kyctapp-1954.