MID-CONTINENT REAL ESTATE, INC. v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

MID-CONTINENT REAL ESTATE, INC. v. Smith

254 S.W.3d 920, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 930, 2008 WL 2414854

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 2008

DocketWD 68100

StatusPublished

This text of 254 S.W.3d 920 (MID-CONTINENT REAL ESTATE, INC. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MID-CONTINENT REAL ESTATE, INC. v. Smith, 254 S.W.3d 920, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 930, 2008 WL 2414854 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

In a suit by a landlord to recover unpaid rent under a commercial lease, the trial court found for the tenant and awarded no rent. Appellant landlord brings this appeal, asserting error in the court’s determination that no rent was due and in the admission of defense evidence without a proper foundation. On review of the record, this court determines that the appellant’s points are without merit. A memorandum explaining the reasoning used by this court has been provided to the parties. There would be no precedential value to a published opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

In a suit by a landlord to recover unpaid rent under a commercial lease, the trial court found for the tenant and awarded no rent. Appellant landlord brings this appeal, asserting error in the court’s determination that no rent was due and in the admission of defense evidence without a proper foundation. On review of the record, this court determines that the appellant’s points are without merit. A memorandum explaining the reasoning used by this court has been provided to the parties. There would be no precedential value to a published opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 S.W.3d 920, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 930, 2008 WL 2414854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-continent-real-estate-inc-v-smith-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack