Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board

1942 OK 353, 131 P.2d 753, 191 Okla. 572, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 288

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 20, 1942·No. No. 30859.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WELCH, C. J.

This appeal involves protests based upon the contention that appropriations for school districts Nos. 8, 12, and 45 of Okmulgee county are excessive because total valuations in the district were not as great as the total assessed valuations employed by the excise board in calculating the rates of levy.

These are the same school districts from which parts of territory were taken by annexation as shown and discussed in case No. 30860, the Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County, Excise Board, decided this date by this court, 191 Okla. 586, 131 P. 2d 745. That case and the present case are briefed as one on the issues herein. Our views and conclusion therein dispose of the question presented here.

Judgment affirmed.

OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. HURST, J., concurs in result. GIBSON, J., dissents. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WELCH, C. J.

This appeal involves protests based upon the contention that appropriations for school districts Nos. 8, 12, and 45 of Okmulgee county are excessive because total valuations in the district were not as great as the total assessed valuations employed by the excise board in calculating the rates of levy.

These are the same school districts from which parts of territory were taken by annexation as shown and discussed in case No. 30860, the Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County, Excise Board, decided this date by this court, 191 Okla. 586, 131 P. 2d 745. That case and the present case are briefed as one on the issues herein. Our views and conclusion therein dispose of the question presented here.

Judgment affirmed.

OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. HURST, J., concurs in result. GIBSON, J., dissents. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board, 1942 OK 353, 131 P.2d 753, 191 Okla. 572, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 288 (Okla. 1942).

Pincite

1942 OK 353 (Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related