Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield

1935 OK 1129, 51 P.2d 502, 174 Okla. 601, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 19, 1935
DocketNo. 24592.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1935 OK 1129 (Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield, 1935 OK 1129, 51 P.2d 502, 174 Okla. 601, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

RILEY, J.

The defendants have filed in this cause a confession of error, wherein they plead that the decision of this court in the case of Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Ross, 173 Okla. 524, 49 P. (2d) 184, is decisive of all the questions involved in the instant appeal.

In accord with the prayer contained in the confession of error, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to issue a writ of injunction as sought by the prayer contained in the petition of plaintiff below, plaintiff in error.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BUSBY and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Stemco Manufacturing Co.
1981 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1981)
Jordan v. Peek
1954 OK 18 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1954)
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Donahey
1951 OK 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
Pine v. Duncan
1937 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 1129, 51 P.2d 502, 174 Okla. 601, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-continent-petroleum-corp-v-stubblefield-okla-1935.