Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield
1935 OK 1129, 51 P.2d 502, 174 Okla. 601, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325
Opinion
The defendants have filed in this cause a confession of error, wherein they plead that the decision of this court in the case of Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Ross, 173 Okla. 524, 49 P. (2d) 184, is decisive of all the questions involved in the instant appeal.
In accord with the prayer contained in the confession of error, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to issue a writ of injunction as sought by the prayer contained in the petition of plaintiff below, plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield, 1935 OK 1129, 51 P.2d 502, 174 Okla. 601, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325 (Okla. 1935).
1935 OK 1129 (Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Stemco Manufacturing Co.
1981 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1981)
Jordan v. Peek
1954 OK 18 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1954)
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Donahey
1951 OK 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
Pine v. Duncan
1937 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)