Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Dooley

1942 OK 202, 126 P.2d 68, 190 Okla. 601, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 155

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 19, 1942

DocketNo. 30182.

StatusPublished

This text of 1942 OK 202 (Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Dooley, 1942 OK 202, 126 P.2d 68, 190 Okla. 601, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 155 (Okla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in the trial court in an action for damages. On the 10th day of April, 1942, a confession of error was filed which was joined in by the plaintiff in error and defendants in error, the same amounting to a stipulation that error was committed according to the allegations of the petition. In said confession of error application is made for a reversal and remanding of the cause to the trial court, with directions to set aside and hold for naught the judgment herein appealed from.

Upon the authority of In re Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 164 Okla. 264, 23 P. 2d 690, the cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court, with directions to set aside and hold for naught the judgment herein appealed from.

CORN, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., and GIBSON and HURST, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in the trial court in an action for damages. On the 10th day of April, 1942, a confession of error was filed which was joined in by the plaintiff in error and defendants in error, the same amounting to a stipulation that error was committed according to the allegations of the petition. In said confession of error application is made for a reversal and remanding of the cause to the trial court, with directions to set aside and hold for naught the judgment herein appealed from.

Upon the authority of In re Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 164 Okla. 264, 23 P. 2d 690, the cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court, with directions to set aside and hold for naught the judgment herein appealed from.

CORN, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., and GIBSON and HURST, JJ., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1942 OK 202, 126 P.2d 68, 190 Okla. 601, 1942 Okla. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-continent-petroleum-corp-v-dooley-okla-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack